Orcho Docs Map by Operator Path
Read top down
Do not start from every subsystem at once. Start with one run, then move down the ladder only when the current layer raises a concrete question: quality, measurement, control, extension, design, or raw contracts.
Start simple
Section titled “Start simple”Use this layer when you are still deciding whether Orcho makes sense or trying to complete the first run.
| Question | Read |
|---|---|
| What is the smallest useful path? | Quickstart |
| Which install path should I use? | Installation methods |
| What is Orcho? | What is Orcho? |
| Can I understand the idea in one run story? | Orcho in 5 minutes |
| What happens in one project? | Your first run |
| What should I watch while it runs? | Watch the run |
| What did the run leave behind? | Read the result |
| Something failed early. Now what? | Troubleshooting |
Operate delivery
Section titled “Operate delivery”Use this layer when Orcho is no longer a trial command and you need to move real delivery forward.
| Operating need | Read |
|---|---|
| Understand the lifecycle | Run lifecycle |
| Read a deeper feature-shaped run | Run anatomy |
| Decide whether a retained run should land | Delivery control |
| Understand plan contracts and subtask DAGs | Plan contract and DAG |
| Handle pauses and advice | Handoffs and advisors |
| Move forward after rejected final acceptance | Correction follow-ups |
| Choose resume versus follow-up | Recovery and resume |
Improve quality
Section titled “Improve quality”Use this layer when the goal is better delivery quality, not lighter prompting.
| Quality question | Read |
|---|---|
| How should workflow depth match task risk? | Profile semantics |
| Can Orcho recommend a profile? | Profile advisor |
| What makes a gate trustworthy? | Gates and verification |
| How does Orcho catch work that says done too early? | False-ready delivery |
| How do checks become durable proof? | Verification receipts |
| What evidence exists after the run? | Evidence bundle |
Measure and govern
Section titled “Measure and govern”Use this layer when the question is whether agent-assisted delivery is improving over a team, project, or run window.
| Evaluation question | Read |
|---|---|
| What should leaders measure first? | Measure and govern |
| How should a technical leader evaluate Orcho? | For technical leaders |
| Where did the workload and cost go? | Cost accounting |
| How should expensive and lower-cost runtimes be mixed? | Runtime economics |
| What does one complete real run prove? | A real run, annotated |
| What stage and scope is the project in? | Project status |
| What crosses the data-flow boundary? | Security and privacy |
Control surfaces
Section titled “Control surfaces”Use this layer when a CLI-only workflow is not enough and another tool needs to start, observe, diagnose, or decide runs.
| Control need | Read |
|---|---|
| Can my AI client drive Orcho for me? | Let your agent drive it |
| How do I set up MCP? | Start with MCP |
| When is an LLM captain worth the overhead? | LLM captain mode |
| What tools does MCP expose? | MCP control surface |
| What recipes and resources exist? | Workflow recipes and resources |
| How does a client observe a run? | Observe a run |
| How do experts build the loop? | Expert MCP control loop |
| How do runs work without prompts? | Unattended runs and CI |
Build and extend
Section titled “Build and extend”Use this layer when you are shaping Orcho for a repository, team, or extension.
| Builder need | Read |
|---|---|
| Understand workspace boundaries | Workspace model |
| Grow from mono-run to participant sets | From mono-run to participant sets |
| Coordinate one feature across repositories | Cross-project mode |
| Teach Orcho a project | Project tuning and plugins |
| Turn native checks into durable gates | Scheduled verification setup |
| Design a cost-aware gate portfolio | Quality gate strategy |
| Route subtasks to domain capabilities | Skill registry |
| Understand prompt composition | Prompt engine |
| Tune workflow depth and gates | Profiles and gates |
| Connect worker CLIs and wrappers | Runtime adapters |
Architecture
Section titled “Architecture”Use this layer when the operating surface raises a “why is it built this way?” question. These pages are design narratives; exact schemas live in reference.
| Design question | Read |
|---|---|
| What are the engine’s first-class concepts? | The engine model |
| Why can runs be resumed and repaired safely? | Runs as recorded state |
| What makes a gate verdict trustworthy? | Gates and verification |
| Why do runs get their own checkout? | Isolation and delivery boundary |
| How are worker prompts composed and protected? | The prompt plane |
| How does one intent span several repos? | Cross-project projection |
| How is the MCP server structured? | MCP control plane anatomy |
Reference contracts
Section titled “Reference contracts”Use reference pages after the operating model is clear.
| Contract need | Read |
|---|---|
| Configure Orcho | Configuration |
| Inspect profile modes and schema keys | Profiles |
| Understand run statuses | Run state reference |
| Find the command surface | CLI |
| Inspect run files | Artifacts |
| Consume the event stream | Events |
Domain slices
Section titled “Domain slices”The same docs can also be read by subsystem once you know your problem surface.
Rule for going deeper
Section titled “Rule for going deeper”Move to the next layer only when the current layer raises a concrete question:
- “Can I run it?” -> Start simple.
- “What do I do with this run?” -> Operate delivery.
- “How do we make the result more trustworthy?” -> Improve quality.
- “Are we getting better?” -> Measure and govern.
- “How do other tools control it?” -> Control surfaces.
- “How do we adapt it to our projects?” -> Build and extend.
- “Why is it built this way?” -> Architecture.
- “What exactly is the contract?” -> Reference.
That keeps the docs from becoming a wall while still giving deep readers a clear path down.