Skip to content

Docs map

Use this layer when you are still deciding whether Orcho makes sense.

QuestionRead
What is Orcho?What is Orcho?
Can I see the whole idea in one run story?Orcho in 5 minutes
Can my AI client run Orcho for me?Let your agent drive it
How do I run one task?Quickstart
What should I watch while it runs?Watch the run
What did the run leave behind?Read the result
Why do profiles matter, deeper?Profile semantics
Can Orcho recommend the profile?Profile advisor

This layer should stay compact. It explains the promise: Orcho turns agent work into accountable delivery runs.

Use this layer when you are running real work and need to make decisions.

Operating needRead
Understand the lifecycleRun lifecycle
Control delivery decisionsDelivery control
Run tuned projects without promptsCI autopilot
Read a deeper feature-shaped runRun anatomy
Understand plan contracts and subtask DAGsPlan contract and DAG
Understand pauses and handoff adviceHandoffs and advisors
Understand run economicsCost accounting
Recover after rejectionCorrection follow-ups
Choose resume vs follow-upRecovery and resume
Start through MCPStart with MCP
Understand MCP ROILLM captain mode
Operate through MCPMCP control surface
Observe a run from a clientObserve a run
Build an expert MCP captain loopExpert MCP control loop
Understand workspace boundariesWorkspace model
Coordinate across project boundariesCross-project mode

This layer is where Orcho becomes an operator tool, not only a CLI command.

Use this layer when the question is not “how do I operate a run?”, but “what does Orcho change for the person accountable for delivery?”

Decision questionRead
How should a technical leader evaluate Orcho?For technical leaders
How do we judge workflow economics?Cost accounting
What crosses the security boundary?Security and privacy
When is MCP worth the overhead?LLM captain mode
What proof exists after the run?Evidence bundle
Where does cross-project work matter?Cross-project mode

This is not a separate developer path. Developers and operators should read Light entry and Advanced operation first. Decision lenses are for tech leads, CTOs, VPs of Delivery, and anyone judging accountability, adoption, economics, and organizational risk.

Use this layer when you are shaping Orcho for a repository, team, or extension.

Builder needRead
Teach Orcho a repositoryProject tuning and plugins
Understand participant topologyFrom mono-run to participant sets
Coordinate one feature across repositoriesCross-project mode
Route subtasks to domain capabilitiesSkill registry
Understand prompt compositionPrompt engine
Tune workflow depth and gatesProfiles and gates
Inspect every profile mode and schema keyProfile reference
Connect worker CLIsRuntime adapters
Understand every config surfaceConfiguration reference
Inspect proof artifactsEvidence bundle
Prove verification ranVerification receipts
Work from raw contractsConfiguration, Profiles, CLI, Artifacts, Events

This layer should be dense. It is for people who already understand the run shape and now need contracts.

The same docs can also be read by product subsystem.

Run controlLifecycle, delivery decisions, plan/DAG, handoffs, follow-ups, resume.Profiles and gatesThe semantic plane, verification boundary, readiness policy, receipts.Evidence and trustRecorded result, artifacts, events, cost, proof that gates actually ran.WorkspacesRun state, project boundaries, participant sets, isolation choices.Cross-project deliveryOne feature intent split across repo boundaries and returned to one gate.Decision lensesLeadership, economics, adoption risk, MCP ROI, and accountability.Prompt enginePrompt parts, protected contracts, project context, utility-lab primitives.Project knowledgePlugins, project policy, prompt overrides, routed skills.Worker runtimesWorker CLIs, phase routing, adapter boundaries, cost accounting.MCP controlTyped client control for start, observe, diagnose, and decide.Reference contractsConfiguration, profiles, CLI, artifacts, events.

Run control is the lifecycle plus the decisions that move it forward.

Decision lenses are not a separate developer tutorial. They help accountable people evaluate Orcho from the responsibility they carry: quality, adoption, economics, policy, and cross-system risk.

Profiles choose the shape of work. Gates decide whether work can continue or deliver. Isolation policy decides whether that work happens in a retained run-owned checkout or directly in the project checkout.

Evidence is the durable proof surface behind a run.

Workspaces separate project code from run state. Participant sets explain how Orcho grows beyond one repository. Cross-project mode is the delivery shape for one feature intent that must move across project boundaries and return to one system release decision.

Cross-project delivery is the advanced surface for API/web, backend/mobile, runtime/MCP, analytics, docs, or infra work that fails at the boundary between systems.

The prompt engine composes role, task, format, protected contracts, project context, and turn payload before a worker runtime is invoked.

Project tuning, prompt overrides, and skills are different customization surfaces. Use plugins for project facts and policy. Use the skill registry for portable specialist procedures that can be routed to subtasks.

Worker runtimes are agent CLIs. Orcho routes phases to them, but does not let them own the delivery protocol.

MCP is the typed control surface for clients that start, observe, diagnose, and decide runs.

Use reference pages after the operating model is clear.

Move to the next layer only when the current layer raises a concrete question:

  • “What is this?” -> light entry.
  • “What do I do now?” -> advanced operator.
  • “How do I configure or extend it?” -> expert builder.
  • “What exactly is the contract?” -> reference.

That keeps the docs from becoming a wall, while still giving deep readers a clear path down.